Introduction UNION vs UNION ALL
In SQL, UNION vs UNION ALL can be used to combine the results of two or more queries. Despite having comparable functions, they differ significantly in ways that impact output and performance. The main distinctions between UNION ALL vs UNION are examined in this article along with their use cases and recommended implementation techniques.
What is UNION in SQL?
Combining Results with UNION
The UNION operator in SQL is used to combine the results of two or more SELECT statements into a single result set. This operator removes duplicate rows from the final result, ensuring each row is unique.
Syntax and Usage
The basic syntax for using UNION is as follows:
Each SELECT statement within the UNION must have the same number of columns in the same order, with similar data types.
What is UNION ALL in SQL?
Combining Results with UNION ALL
UNION ALL, similar to UNION, combines the results of two or more SELECT statements. However, unlike UNION, UNION ALL does not remove duplicate rows, which means all records from the SELECT statements are included in the final result set.
Syntax and Usage
The syntax for using UNION ALL is:
This syntax is almost identical to UNION, making it easy to switch between the two based on the requirement.
Key Differences Between UNION and UNION ALL
Handling Duplicates
The primary difference between UNION vs UNION ALL is how they handle duplicates. UNION performs a DISTINCT operation on the result set, removing duplicates, whereas UNION ALL includes all duplicates.
Performance Considerations
Since UNION removes duplicates, it requires additional processing, which can affect performance, especially with large datasets. UNION ALL, on the other hand, performs faster as it simply concatenates the results without the extra step of removing duplicates.
Use Cases for UNION
When to Use UNION
UNION is best used when you need a distinct list of records from multiple SELECT statements. Common scenarios include merging lists of unique values from different tables or queries where duplicates must be avoided.
Example Scenario
For instance, if you are combining customer lists from different regions and want to ensure each customer appears only once in the final list, UNION is the appropriate choice.
Use Cases for UNION ALL
When to Use UNION ALL
UNION ALL is ideal when duplicates are acceptable or necessary. This can be beneficial in scenarios where you need to include all instances of the combined data, such as aggregating sales records from multiple stores where duplicates represent valid, separate transactions.
Example Scenario
For example, if you are creating a comprehensive sales report from different branches and each sale record is significant, using UNION ALL ensures that no sales data is lost due to duplicate removal.
Best Practices for Using UNION and UNION ALL
Choosing the Right Operator
Selecting between UNION vs UNION ALL should be based on the specific needs of your query. Assess whether duplicates are meaningful in your dataset or if performance is a critical factor.
Optimizing Queries
To optimize the performance of queries using UNION, ensure indexes are properly used and avoid unnecessary columns in SELECT statements. For UNION ALL, ensure that the volume of data being processed is manageable to maintain performance.
Conclusion
Summary of Key Points
Understanding the differences between UNION ALL vs UNION is crucial for writing efficient SQL queries. UNION removes duplicates, ensuring unique results but at a performance cost. UNION ALL retains duplicates and is generally faster.
Practical Application
By carefully choosing between UNION ALL vs UNION based on the context of your data and the requirements of your query, you can optimize the performance and accuracy of your SQL operations.
For More Details NCD!